Our laboratory is using a combination of molecular, genetic, and biochemical approaches to investigate biological functions regulated by the highly conserved and ubiquitous Ras G-proteins. Ras proteins act as switches for signal transduction pathways governing numerous essential biological activities, such as cell division, development, cell death, and organization of the cytoskeleton. One of the most daunting and perplexing activities involving Ras is tumorigenesis. Constitutively active forms of Ras proteins are commonly found in many types of tumors, and can efficiently transform cells in culture.
In
humans, there are three RAS genes, which encode four Ras proteins with
more than 90% identity in amino acid sequence. The biochemical properties
of these proteins are nearly the same and very straightforward (Fig.
1). Ras can bind either GTP or GDP. In the resting state, Ras is primarily
GDP-bound and inactive. In response to signals, Ras switches to the active
GTP-bound state, a process catalyzed by guanine nucleotide exchange factors
(GEFs). Activated Ras stimulates effector proteins to turn on downstream
pathways. How a given Ras protein functions in the cell, however, is anything
but straightforward. Despite the fact that several proteins have been identified
to act downstream of Ras, how they affect cancer formation remains largely
unknown. The best documented Ras effector in animal cells is the Raf protein
kinase. Ras also interacts with the conserved Rho G-proteins, such as Cdc42,
for oncogenesis. The link between the Ras-Raf pathway and cancer is quite
obvious as Ras and Raf mediate the signal for cell division generated by
growth factors. By contrast, how Ras and Cdc42 interact to affect tumor
formation is unclear. In addition, by one count, there are at least three
Ras effectors and five GEFs. Under experimental conditions, most known
Ras effectors and GEFs can interact with nearly all the Ras proteins, but
how they actually match up with one another in the cell is poorly understood.
My lab uses the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, as a model system, which is amenable to an array of genetic manipulations, including gene deletion, that are not readily available to more complex systems (Learn more about the S. pombe genome sequencing project). The power of this system was first exploited by Paul Nurse, whose lab discovered Cdk (cyclin-dependent kinase) as a universal machine governing eukaryotic cell division. Because of this pioneering contribution, Paul Nurse was awarded the Nobel prize in 2001 (Listen to his acceptance speech). S. pombe contains a single Ras homolog, Ras1, which shares a striking 67% identity in the amino acid sequence with the human Ras. This suggests that yeast Ras1 can interact with its GEFs and effectors in a fashion very similar to those in humans.
Indeed,
we and others have shown that Ras1 controls two conserved pathways with
distinct outputs (Fig. 2 and see PDF).
Ras1 interacts with the Byr2 protein kinase, which mediates signals generated
by the mating pheromone. The interaction between Ras1 and Byr2 is analogous
to that between human Ras and Raf. We also discovered a second Ras1 effector,
Scd1, which is a presumptive GEF for Cdc42. Activated Cdc42 in turn stimulates
a protein kinase, Shk1/PAK1. The inactivation of the Ras1-Cdc42 pathway
readily leads to alterations of many cellular functions (see below), including
the change of cell morphology (from being rod-shape to round)
1. To reveal biological functions controlled by the yeast Ras1-Cdc42 pathway
that are important to tumorigenesis in humans:
To this end, we are focusing on a novel component in this pathway, Yin6
(PDF).
Intriguingly, Yin6 is structurally and functionally homologous to the mammalian
Int6, which was first discovered as an integration site by the mouse mammary
tumor virus (Fig 3).
What
role Int6 plays in breast cancer formation is not clear. Our yeast data
support a model in which Int6 cooperates with Ras to regulate the function
of the 26S proteasome (Fig. 4). Inactivation
of this process leads to accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins that
block proper cell cycle control and genetic stability (PDF, Fig
5).
We
plan to delineate the mechanism by which Yin6 and Ras1 regulates the proteasome
functioning and to test our ideas in the mammalian cell.
2. To delineate conserved mechanisms by which a single Ras can coordinate interactions with multiple factors:
We
have shown that the specificity of the Ras pathways can be regulated by
the GEF (PDF).
In S. pombe, Ras1 has two GEFs, Ste6 and Efc25 (Fig.
6). The former controls the Ras1-Byr2 pathway, while the latter Ras1-Scd1
pathway. We are currently testing a hypothesis that GEF can influence the
binding between Ras and downstream effectors and we plan to test this to
see if it also operates in other eukaryotes.